The argument on this subject consistently goes both ways. On one hand we have the machine learning and artificial intelligence technologists that would argue against human intervention. Then on the other hand, there are professionals that argue when machines handle event analysis alone, that too many false positives come forward (that is poor filtering, actually), or too many false negatives may consistently go undetected. The operational word in that last sentence meaning “consistently”. Consistency is where a machine outperforms the human counterpart, but the types of events is rather vast. Eventually, you could map out a massive logic flow but the more difficult challenge would be to update such a workflow for changing technology, processes, people, and attack vectors. Continue reading Human Intervention In Event Analysis